Kiribati Green Roads Profile 2025

Outline

KIRIBATI

GREEN ROADS PROFILE


Supported by:


The ATO green roads profiles present country-level perspectives on how 35 Asia-Pacific economies are addressing the development and management of sustainable eco-friendly roads. Drawing from diverse datasets and policy documents, the profiles highlight practices and measures that contribute to greener transport infrastructure.

Developed by the Asian Transport Observatory (ATO) in partnership with the International Road Federation (IRF), the profiles are designed to complement the Green Roads Toolkit. The toolkit provides a practical reference for integrating good practices across nine dimensions:

This 2025 edition builds on earlier work to provide a comprehensive resource for guiding the planning, development, construction, and management of greener, more sustainable roads.

Background

Indicator - Dimension Matrix



Kiribati is a nation defined by the sea, yet its internal struggles are rooted on land. Its geography is fragmented across 810 square kilometers, but surprisingly, it has a dense road network. With 719 kilometers of roads, the infrastructure density is 887 meters per square kilometer, nearly double the Asia-Pacific average of about 450 meters. Despite this, high density doesn't mean high utility. Most of the network—92%—comprises local and rural roads, with no motorways or highways.

Trucks make up 42% of the traffic; two-wheelers another 43%. Motorization remains low, standing at 111 vehicles per thousand people in 2024, a fraction of the Asia-Pacific average of 317. Yet, the emissions do not reflect this austerity. Road transport GHG emissions reached 33 thousand tonnes of CO2e in 2024. They are growing at 5.8% annually, outpacing the broader economy's 3.4% growth.

Here lies the inefficiency. Kiribati's road transport emissions intensity is 67 grams of CO2e per USD of GDP. The Asia-Pacific average is 26. Even among Pacific Island peers, who average 49, Kiribati is an outlier. The economy is burning more fuel to generate less value than almost anywhere else in the region. Since 2015, while the rest of the Pacific improved intensity by 4.3% per year, Kiribati managed only 2.9%.

The cost of this inefficiency is not just atmospheric. It is financial and physical. Fossil fuel subsidies mask the true price of transport, transferring the burden to society through external costs: congestion accounts for 49% of these externalities, road damages 43%. The electric vehicle transition has not started. The UNEP E-mobility Readiness Index scores the nation at 37 out of 100, with a policy score of zero.

The transport sector emitted 15 tonnes of PM 2.5 in 2022. Roads contributed a fifth of this. It sounds negligible until the health bill arrives. The World Bank estimates the annual cost of health damages from PM 2.5 exposure at 9% of GDP.

Biodiversity is losing ground. In a nation where land is scarce, roads are encroaching on the few wild spaces left. Five of the country's fifteen Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) have been bisected by infrastructure. This amounts to 191 meters of road per thousand square kilometers of KBA. The Asia-Pacific average is 88. Kiribati is paving over its ecological safety net at twice the regional rate.

Safety remains stagnant. Eight deaths were recorded in 2021. But the most damning metric is vulnerability. The National Road Vulnerability Index ranks countries on the likelihood of network failure during natural hazards. Kiribati ranks 208th. Last. Out of 208 countries. The network has no redundancy. One storm, one flood, and the system snaps. This is not theoretical. Fifty-four thousand rural residents—nearly half the population—live more than 2 kilometers from an all-season road. They are isolated from healthcare, markets, and disaster recovery. When the roads fail, these people are not just inconvenienced. They are cut off.

Kiribati presents a paradox. The road network is extensive relative to the land area but functionally brittle. It is inefficient, producing carbon intensities far exceeding regional benchmarks, and physically fragile, ranking lowest globally in network vulnerability. The complete absence of an electric vehicle market and the zero-score policy framework for e-mobility suggest a sector locked in a fossil-fuel past. Immediate policy intervention is required to decouple connectivity from carbon and to secure rural access against the inevitable shock of climate disruption.

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Decarbonization

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Climate Resilience

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Water and Land Management

Export PDF
Export Image

Reducing Pollution

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Preserving Biodiversity

Sustainable Materials Sourcing and Construction Practices

Export PDF
Export Image

Improving Quality of life

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Disaster Preparedness

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Fostering Inclusive Growth

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Export PDF
Export Image

Supporting Information

Road Infrastructure Pipeline

Kiribati Kiritimati Infrastructure Project2024NoneNone

Unit Cost Road Projects

Export PDF
Export Image

Road Transport Policy Landscape

Road Transport Policy Targets

No data


Road Transport Policy Measure Types

Export PDF
Export Image

References

AIIB. (n.d.). MEASURING TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY FOR TRADE IN ASIA. https://impact.economist.com/perspectives/sites/default/files/eco141_aiib_transport_connectivity_4.pdf/

Asian Transport Observatory. (2025). Asia and the Pacific's Transport Infrastructure and Investment Outlook 2035. https://asiantransportobservatory.org/analytical-outputs/asia-transport-infrastructure-investment-needs/

Barrington-Leigh, C., & Millard-Ball, A. (2025). A high-resolution global time series of street-network sprawl. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241306829

CDRI. (2023). Global Infrastructure Risk Model and Resilience Index. https://giri.unepgrid.ch/

CIESIN. (2023a). Rural Access Index [Dataset]. https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/sdgi-9-1-1-rai-2023

CIESIN. (2023b). SDG Indicator 11.2.1: Urban Access to Public Transport, 2023 Release: Sustainable Development Goal Indicators (SDGI). https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/sdgi-11-2-1-urban-access-public-transport-2023

EDGAR. (2025). GHG emissions of all world countries: 2025. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/9816914

Ember. (2024). Electricity Data Explorer [Dataset]. https://ember-energy.org/data/electricity-data-explorer

EM-DAT. (2025). EM-DAT - The international disaster database. https://www.emdat.be/

European Commission. (2024). Global Air Pollutant Emissions EDGAR v8.1 [Dataset]. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset_ap61#sources

IEA. (n.d.). Fossil Fuel Subsidies. IEA. Retrieved April 19, 2025, from https://www.iea.org/topics/fossil-fuel-subsidies

ILO. (2025). ILOSTAT [Dataset]. https://rplumber.ilo.org/files/website/bulk/indicator.html

ITDP. (2024). The Atlas of Sustainable City Transport. https://atlas.itdp.org/

Koks, E., Rozenberg, J., Tariverdi, M., Dickens, B., Fox, C., Ginkel, K. van, & Hallegatte, S. (2023). A global assessment of national road network vulnerability. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 3(2), 025008. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/acd1aa

Liu, K., Wang, Q., Wang, M., & Koks, E. E. (2023). Global transportation infrastructure exposure to the change of precipitation in a warmer world. Nature Communications, 14(1), 2541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38203-3

McDuffie, E. E., Martin, R. V., Spadaro, J. V., Burnett, R., Smith, S. J., O'Rourke, P., Hammer, M. S., van Donkelaar, A., Bindle, L., Shah, V., Jaeglé, L., Luo, G., Yu, F., Adeniran, J. A., Lin, J., & Brauer, M. (2021). Source sector and fuel contributions to ambient PM2.5 and attributable mortality across multiple spatial scales. Nature Communications, 12(1), 3594. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23853-y

Parry, S. B., Antung A. Liu,Ian W. H. (2023). IMF Fossil Fuel Subsidies Data: 2023 Update. IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2023/08/22/imf-fossil-fuel-subsidies-data-2023-update-537281

Simkins, A. T., Beresford, A. E., Buchanan, G. M., Crowe, O., Elliott, W., Izquierdo, P., Patterson, D. J., & Butchart, S. H. M. (2023). A global assessment of the prevalence of current and potential future infrastructure in Key Biodiversity Areas. Biological Conservation, 281, 109953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109953

Sims, M., Stanimirova, R., Neumann, M., Raichuk, A., & Purves, D. (2025). New Data Shows What's Driving Forest Loss Around the World. https://www.wri.org/insights/forest-loss-drivers-data-trends

Trademap. (2025). Trade Map. Trade Map. https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx

UN DESA. (n.d.). Economic and Environmental Vulnerability Indicators. Retrieved January 26, 2026, from https://policy.desa.un.org/themes/least-developed-countries-category/ldc-identification-criteria-indicators/evi-indicators

UN DESA. (2025). 2024 Revision of World Population Prospects. https://population.un.org/wpp/

UN Energy Statistics. (2025). Energy Balance Visualization [Dataset]. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/energystats/dataPortal/

UNEP. (2021, May 12). Domestic material consumption (DMC) and DMC per capita, per GDP (Tier I). https://www.unep.org/indicator-1222

Weiss, D. J., Nelson, A., Gibson, H. S., Temperley, W., Peedell, S., Lieber, A., Hancher, M., Poyart, E., Belchior, S., Fullman, N., Mappin, B., Dalrymple, U., Rozier, J., Lucas, T. C. D., Howes, R. E., Tusting, L. S., Kang, S. Y., Cameron, E., Bisanzio, D., … Gething, P. W. (2018). A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature, 553(7688), 333-336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25181

WHO. (2023). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023. https://www.who.int/teams/social-determinants-of-health/safety-and-mobility/global-status-report-on-road-safety-2023

Wiedenhofer, D., Baumgart, A., Matej, S., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Lanau, M., Tingley, D. D., Liu, Z., Guo, J., Tanikawa, H., & Haberl, H. (2024). Mapping and modelling global mobility infrastructure stocks, material flows and their embodied greenhouse gas emissions [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139742

World Bank. (2021). ICP 2021. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/icp-2021

World Bank. (2022a). Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources) [Dataset]. https://data.worldbank.org

World Bank. (2022b). Land area (sq. Km) [Dataset]. https://data.worldbank.org

World Bank. (2022c). The Global Health Cost of PM2.5 Air Pollution: A Case for Action Beyond 2021. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1816-5

World Bank. (2023). Forest area (% of land area) [Dataset]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.FRST.ZS

World Bank. (2024). Home | Logistics Performance Index (LPI). Logistics Performance Index. https://lpi.worldbank.org/

World Bank. (2025a). GDP per capita, PPP (current international $) [Dataset]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD

World Bank. (2025b). GDP, PPP (current international $) [Dataset]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.PP.CD

World Database on Protected Areas. (2024). Protected Areas (WDPA) [Dataset]. https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/wdpa?tab=WDPA